The assets are mismeasured and mismanaged, although it is held by governments. Citizens—the ultimate owners of those assets—should demand better. If “public wealth” was properly measured, managed, and better understood, society as an entire would benefit. But, to assist build robust public finances, this needs professional accountants and modern accounting within the public sector.

If the globe wants growth, it needs bookkeeping and accountants within the public sector.

The global exchange is worth about US $78 trillion, which is roughly similar to the scale of the world economy—or global GDP. By armies of analysts, brokers, investors, regulators, tax authorities, and media, this wealth segment is scrutinized at every moment. Using modern accounting standards refined over the last 800 years, much of the knowledge that’s analyzed is predicated on audited accounts. What has not only enabled capital market development but also the wealth that we all enjoy today, is the event of those accounting standards.

Although the worth of public assets is twice that of world stock markets, or 2x global GDP, in step with estimates from the International fund, it remains unaudited, unsupervised, and unregulated. Even worse, it’s almost entirely unaccounted for. When developing their budgets, most governments largely ignore these assets and, the worth that might be generated from them.

The question, within the best interests of citizens, is are public assets getting used and managed? Sadly, the solution is perhaps not. Better accounting might not guarantee that assets are going to be better managed. But knowing what assets you have got and what they’re worth is a prerequisite for professional management, and increases the percentages for a return back to society—instead of raising taxes.

In fact, what could, across advanced economies, generate annually more revenues than governments receive in corporate tax collections, is the professional management of public assets. This might also multiply the funds available for infrastructure investments or the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals.

Including the value of pension promises made to public sector workers, politicians consistently underestimate, or completely ignore, the worth of public assets and liabilities. Although this is often clearly a recipe for poor governance, if not outright corruption, it’s only rarely heard in political debate. The most reason may well be that this is often about accounting—a topic of limited interest to several politicians.

 

ALSO READ: The Economical Pros and Cons of Rent-To-Own Appliances

 

Furthermore, only 8% of all professional accountants are within the public sector, in line with IFAC, the worldwide organization for the accountancy profession. Directly reflected within the poor quality of knowledge employed by governments in their financial management is the relative dearth of public sector accountants. Flying blind into a storm is what managing financial performance and position without sound information is like. And, the realm where financial information is weakest is asset management.

This doesn’t benefit anyone, since poor or risky accounting practices can shake, and ultimately bring down entire societies. Proper accounting is important for the general public sector—and by proper accounting we mean the kind of accounting that has been utilized in the company sector for hundreds of years.

The reality is that the majority of governments are stuck within the Middle Ages when it involves accounting. Economists whose perspective on the management of public finances is restricted to simple measures of money flows and debt, they need for too long been influenced by. This is often like trying to manage a contemporary corporation using only the knowledge available from the cash transactions recorded within the bank statements. Company accounting requires more complex information than this. This can be equally true of governments.

The proper tool is accrual accounting for managing the financial affairs of a contemporary, highly complex government. A contemporary government needs a distinct mindset, a mindset that will recognize that managing public assets can generate revenues to get hold of public services, fund infrastructure investments, and boost the economy—without raising taxes. This implies shifting the main focus to net worth rather than a spotlight on cash and debt alone, just like in the private sector.

So far, using it as a tool for its budgeting, appropriations, and financial reporting, only New Zealand has introduced modern accounting and integrated its record with the budget. Since the general public sector reforms within the mid-1980s, where most comparable governments like Australia and Canada, or larger countries like the united kingdom and US, have a negative net worth, New Zealand has achieved and maintained significantly positive net worth.

We depend on engineers using modern technology to style and build robust bridges. To create robust public finances, we’d like accountants to use modern accounting systems.

This will reduce the burden on future generations and benefit societies today.

 

Social praxis is the unity of though and action. What you believe is what you do. Political economist sees research and action inseparable. Theorist must intervene in light of social anomalies. Political Economic Theory is characterized by three social processes. This process is a starting point in understanding how power and wealth constrains the production, distribution and consumption of media.

1. Commodification. This is the process of turning goods and services into a marketable product. Media has often been commodified.
2. Spatialization. These refers to the process of overcoming the constraints of space and time. In business it involves out sourcing labor. This is most evident on how large corporations build factories in other countries to take advantage of cheap labor. Spatialization also refers to the extension of corporate power through acquisition and strategic alliances. It extends a company’s reach to a wider audience and gives them an advantage in distributing their media. Because who owns the company says a lot of what they produce. Political economy theory considers this when interpreting messages.
3. Structuration. This is based on the view that people make history but not on their own terms. They are forced to function a category that social functions within a category that social institutions have placed. An important activity in structuration is the process of creating Hegenomy. This is defined as a result of a process of transforming contested ideas into a naturalized way of thinking about the world. Political economic theory evaluates how elites dominate the culture, values and ideology of a society. Ceratain norms about social class, race, gender and other social divisions are deeply engrained in the social structure. Political economic theorists must analyze how the media portrays these categories in order to understand societies and address injustice. The importance of these theory is that it encourages us to be reasonably skeptical of the media we consume. It makes us aware of the social forces that shape media and invites us to keep the profit oriented system in check.

What is political economy theory? The name itself gives us a hint. This is an approach to studying media that focuses on the politics and economics of media. It asks the question: How does power and wealth influence our systems of mass media? Political economy theory studies the power relations that influence the production, distribution and consumption of communication resources. In doing so, they shed light on why some messages are emphasized and other down played. This theory shows that corporate influence pervades society. It does not focus on the science and symbols of the text as cultural studies do. Rather it studies how the Government and stock market affect the media that we consume.

This theory has always been used to understand social change in history. The theory also examines the totality of social relations. It holds that the political, economic, social and cultural areas of life are intertwined. This various meet and influence media indifferent ways. Political Economic Theory is guided by moral philosophy. It not only describes the state of society but also encourages people to change their social behavior. With the knowledge of the society’s problem, theorist is driven to fight for democratic issues such as freedom of speech and access to education.

Most economy during this pandemic have been struggling hard to recover. Some economies have had different obstacles like red tape that threaten growth. Because of this pandemic different Government in different nation implement new regulations. With new regulations comes bigger bureaucracies. If these regulations get out of control then the economies suffer.

Since this pandemic started many unemployment has been hitting at a high rate. Different government regulations on this problems has a great impact. Different regulations may hinder the solution to this. It would cause more harm than good affecting mostly the economy. The lockdowns has also impacted the economy. Regulations on easing the lockdowns are also taken to consider. These is a burdens on the economy particularly on businesses. It create barriers to job growth and further hampers many fragile economies. If we want to overcome this crisis the Government should get serious on their response toward the virus and pandemic. They should review and polish different regulations being imposed. They should weigh the advantages and disadvantages. They should strengthen oversight and tackle different obstacles seriously.

Political economy is the study of the interaction of politics and economics. Where politics is the study of power and economics, the study of money or it focuses on the creation and distribution of wealth.  It is taking a look at a specific way on how goods and money get distributed within a particular country or between states. Both power and money go together, they are interchangeable.

Key concepts:

1. Markets. This is defined as what do people buy or sell.
2. Property. This is the ability to do what you want with an object.
3. Public Goods. These are things that are diffused to everyone. They usually come from state mechanism.

Different theories of political economy:

• Liberalism. This is a free market view.
• Mercantilism. This concept is followed when the State should have the most power in the market and economy.
• Communism. This concept believes that everyone should have equal amounts of properties. It results to people jointly owning everything.
• Social Democracy. There is a regulated market. It is a mix of Liberalism and Communism. The Government provides a lot of Social services to make up for the issues in the pure market.

 

 

Politics is a polarizing issue that arouses strong emotional reactions from many people. Merely uttering the titles “Obama” or even “Trump” is bound to have the juices flowing for several subscribers.

Trusted advisers have the double responsibility of making sure that they conquer these natural human instincts themselves since they behave in a fiduciary capacity whilst at the same time helping their customers conquer them when making fiscal decisions. Being a fiduciary involves making substantial decisions about the best way best to control riches for the advantage of grantors and pensions which may affect many generations ahead. Indulging in a single emotion tied into the political arena is not only imprudent but also can be quite pricey.

Studies and studies have shown that political biases affect one’s decision. In a Quinnipiac University survey from August 2019, there has been a massive gap in the way Republicans and Democrats perceived the condition of the market. From the study, 43 percent of Republicans described the market as “exceptional,” and yet the other 45% described it as “good.” But, one of the Democrats, only 2% explained the condition of the market as “exceptional,” and 37 percent said that it was “good” Roughly 60 percent of Democrats believed it was “not good” or “poor.” Overall, 88 percent of respondents used positive language to the country of this market, while just 39 percent of Democrats did exactly the exact same. In the same way, a 2017 research from the Journal of Financial Markets discovered that at the very last decades of Bill Clinton’s presidency, Democrats were optimistic about the market than Republicans. But, immediately after George W. Bush’s triumph over Al Gore in the 2000 electionthat the Republicans became optimistic. We are living in precisely exactly the exact identical market, however our political affiliation may dramatically affect our perspective of this.

Professional traders are not immune from getting politics influence their believing. A research at the Journal of Banking and Finance discovered a hedge fund manager’s political affiliation “may help determine the portfolio choices of those at the very surface of their financial sophistication ladder.” The researchers noted that a direct correlation between the sort of stocks specialist money managers choose and their political viewpoints. This is particularly intriguing because hedge funds hold incentive prices which function as motivators to outperform different benchmarks. Letting politics affect your paycheck appears to be unthinkable. However, regardless of the incentives, the hedge fund manager believing can be marred by political prejudice.

Ancient Perspective

Recognizing history gives a valuable context when making investment choices and advising customers about the best way best to handle their prosperity. The adviser can talk through the political climate in a level-headed fashion and supply a data-filled outlook that will help direct future investment choices.

There were 58 presidential elections during history, together with all the Republicans and Democrats tied in 24 wins every. (Notice: The 48 complete wins by Democrats and Republicans do not amount to the entire amount of elections since different parties occur in the nation’s early days) Additionally, it is worth noting that an initial couple of decades of this presidential cycle into the entire four, since the Senate and House could alter halfway through because of the midterm elections.

After the Republicans won the presidency and held that the majority in the House and Senate, that occurred 16 days, the 2-year marketplace return was roughly 12 percent yearly. Throughout a Democratic battle, that happened 19 times, there has been a approximately 3.5% yearly return for its initial couple of decades. But following a complete 4-year presidential practice, the annualized returns for a one-party sweep were considerably nearer at 8.6 percent for Republicans and 8.2 percent for Democrats. After Republicans won the presidency with no majority in the House or Senate, there was a 2-year yield of about 1 percent. On the flip side, a Democratic triumph under precisely exactly the exact identical situation has generated a 2-year yield of 14.5 percent. But following a 4-year presidential cycle, the annualized yields are similar at 8.7 percent and 10.9 percent for Democrats and Republicans, respectively.

In general, factoring in most presidencies, and no matter if there was a one-party sweep of the home or Senate, the marketplace did better within the very first 2-year period if there was a Republican triumph. Those intervals reveal that an 8.3%% yield when compared with 5.8 percent to Democratic wins. But over the complete 4-year stipulations, the averages are almost equal at 8.6percent to get a Republican presidency versus 8.8 percent to get a Democratic presidency.

There are an endless number of data that you may analyze in the markets. Additionally, there are lots of ways, like merely altering the beginning and end date marginally or reframing the information, to control the numbers to prove the point. By way of instance, because 1925, through a presidential election season, the economy was up an average of 17.9 percent when a Republican was chosen versus a mean of -2.7 percent when a Democrat had been elected. But during the very first year after a president’s word, the economy was up an average of just 2.6 percent when there has been a Republican when compared with 22.1 percent for a Democrat. The analyst’s political leanings could surely impact if she chooses to revolve around the yearly period prior or after the elections.

The most crucial data point, nevertheless, will be the one that exemplifies the power of compounding. As an instance, in the event that you began investing at the complete U.S. stock exchange indicator in 1979 through President Jimmy Carter’s duration and cashed out 40 decades after in the center of this Donald Trump presidency that you’d have spent throughout three Democratic and four Republican presidents. Additionally you would have undergone an 11.5% annualized yield on your cash. Just one $10,000 investment could have become over $883,000 from the time of your retirement. An individual could parse a thousand figures to emphasize the relative financial advantage of one party on the other. On the other hand, the marketplace will persevere, no matter who is in office. The key for many investors would be to comprehend how their behaviour is influenced by politics and execute approaches to overcome those biases.

Behavioral Finance

Knowing the discipline of behavioral finance might help explain why shareholders are not necessarily fair, possess limited self-control, and therefore so are affected by how that they see the world. The idea of heuristics, that can be an individual’s inclination to take mental shortcuts to make faster decisions, will help shed a little light on this particular situation. Quick decisions tend to be plagued by natural and emotions biases, resulting in mistakes in judgment. Recognizing and understanding these heuristics can enable traders to better their decision-making procedures and conquer those obstacles.

Two common heuristics which appear in the intersection of investing and politics would be “confirmation bias” and “herd mentality.”

Confirmation prejudice

Confirmation bias is the simple fact that people are obviously attracted to swallowing information that confirms their very particular perspective, while blocking out any information to the contrary. This occurs independently from the world of investing and politics. The people who see CNN will normally never watch Fox News, and vice versa. Combining political perspectives with all the markets, and just selectively reviewing data that affirms an investor’s view, is a certain way to eliminate money.

In the realm of investing, it is fine to search for supporting evidence to a investment thesis. But, it is just as important to search for contradictory evidence which does not support your location. Taking the opportunity to deliberate over supporting data and information that challenges the perspective is finally how great investment choices are made.

Herd mindset

Herd mindset takes place when folks would like to be a part of an area with a common culture and socioeconomic standards. This may apply to be a part of a group, place of worship or nation club. A community is likely to make conclusions depending on the common points of view of its associates, and several will discuss them openly. All these groupthink environments consequently cause societal pressures to adapt. If somebody’s herd is composed of sexually like-minded people who say their investment philosophy in a specific manner, there is a higher likelihood that the person will state her investments in a similar vein.

How to Conquer Bias

It is important to have processes and systems in place to defeat these heuristics and make sure investment choices stay sound. The below items are crucial in almost virtually any fiduciary wealth management connection and can assist advisers such as Netwealth (see Netwealth reviews) and their customers to stay the program.

Investment policy statement (IPS)

A well-defined IPS is a superb method to clearly specify a customer’s objectives, maintain the customer on precisely exactly the exact identical webpage as the adviser, and set the customer on course towards achieving her objectives. While the normal IPS highlights a customer’s financial objectives, time horizon, risk tolerance, bandwidth demands, taxation situation, and revenue requirements, it also ought to incorporate any particular preferences the customer summarizes. In the event the customer is a charged person, then laying a particular frame for managing her investments through an election season is a sensible choice.

It isn’t encouraged to highlight certain investments to purchase or sell dependent on the party that is in office. Regardless of any investment dependent on the political climate is hopeless and imprudent. A fantastic example of why it is a bad strategy was that the concern over healthcare stocks on account of the enactment of this Affordable Care Act. Investors were concerned that “ObamaCare,” because it has been known, could ruin health care-related stocks throughout the business. In fact, there was combined results with an assortment of winners and winners from the area. By way of instance, from if President Obama signed the bill on March 23, 2010 at the conclusion of 2013, once the insurance trades were available, the leading nine biggest publicly traded medical insurance businesses and the 10 biggest pharmaceutical firms attained 96.8% and 51.5% overall yields, respectively. This than some 52.2% yield of the Dow Jones Industrial Average over precisely exactly the exact identical period frame. On the other hand, the 10 biggest medical device firms returned just 35.8percent, but drastically underperforming another types.

A much better strategy is to place guardrails on the investments. For example, if a customer is worried that a certain party is in office, rather than visiting all money, an IPS may give the customer the flexibility to maneuver a part of their portfolio, say 10 percent, into money. Alternately, in the event the customer is drawn to particular sectors of this marketplace according to who is at the White House, then the IPS must outline how big of a weighting the customer is allowed to devote to any particular sector. Even though this might not be the perfect means of investing, it suits the customer’s psychological need to make decisions based upon politics, with no derailing their strategy.

Automation

One certain method to get rid of the effect of psychological conclusions would be to construct a degree of automation to the investment procedures. The human component in any budget is essential, however, there are lots of procedures that may successfully be automatic to preserve impartiality and earn efficiency.

A sort of automation is rebalancing, that’s the procedure of correcting the weightings of a portfolio because the investment worth moves up or down as time passes. If a portfolio is rebalanced, resources have been purchased or sold to keep their initial asset allocation, which will be based upon the buyer’s risk tolerance. Investors may place their accounts to automatically rebalance in place dates during the year. Others might prefer their portfolio to automatically measure after a standing grows or shrinks past a particular predetermined percentage degree. Irrespective of the strategy, the action of alcoholism gets the advantage of preventing traders from allowing their feelings to decide when to buy or market present positions.

Another automated procedure is putting up dollar-cost-averaging (DCA). DCA is the procedure for regularly incorporating money at fixed intervals. The advantage is that it gets rid of the urge to time as to go into the marketplace. Throughout the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections, I had friends and coworkers move their cash to money when their preferred candidate did not win the presidency. They believed they could efficiently time that the opportune moment to make out money and finally to invest back to the markets. This was the incorrect choice in both situations. DCA requires the impulse of attempting to time the market from this equation. It is set up through a customer’s IRC Section 401(k) plan at work and may be installed to get a customer’s taxable accounts by working together with her financial adviser.

Diversification

Diversification is also the idea of getting exposure to several investments, like stocks, bonds, commodities and property, and other asset classes. Additionally, it means having vulnerability to several geographical locations, such as outside of a person’s home state. The attractiveness of constantly implementing portfolio diversification is all the fact that no asset category is 100% connected with a different. Meaning if shares are down, then bonds might wind upward. If one’s neighborhood economy is fighting, other nations around the globe could possibly be flourishing. Diversification is a potent strategy as it allows investors to construct wealth over the long run irrespective of what’s occurring in any 1 portion of this current marketplace or who is at the White House.

Advisor’s Role

A number of factors, past simply politics, might impact the movement of stock rates. These comprise inventory basics, earnings, rates of interest, labor gain, market opinion, taxation policy, and financial difficulties. To provide any politician complete credit for economic operation, whether good or poor, seems disingenuous.

It is very important to appreciate the adviser drives the supreme fiscal outcome a lot more than another politician. An adviser will talk to a customer regularly to direct her through significant problems like cash flow direction, sensible investment choices, risk tolerance, time horizon, total asset allocation, tax minimization, and insurance policy. The adviser will tweak the fiscal program as the financial environment changes. Through all of it, the adviser will also attempt to stop customers from making emotional decisions. Simply speaking, an adviser can assist immunize a customer’s portfolio out of political bias and make certain the customer is on course to attain her financial goals.

 

Economics and Politics are undeniably intertwined. This is true because of the following reasons:

1. Economics play and depends greatly on Government policy. Economics is largely affected by the Government’s approach and policies. A good example of this the policy on Lassez-faire.
2. Economic theory and politics influence each other. Forms of government such as Socialism, Communism or Dictatorship has a say on how the economy should ran. Or economically powerful people can also influence and impact the economy by funding. The economy is also being influenced with the politics of the day.

1. All economic theories contain political value judgements. Economists have different theories on how the economic evolves how market competition works. These differences mainly come from different political judgments. A best example of this is the Pareto Criterion. It is defined when the re-allocation of resources cannot improve conditions for a person or a group without worsening conditions for others.
2. Power relationships affect the economy.

•  Structural Power. This power is coming from the imbalances in income and wealth
• The Power to Dictate within organizations.
• The power to make people think. Politics can dictate people on what you want them to think.

The pandemic has caused so much in people’s lives globally. So many lives were lost because of the new virus. Many people suffered, millions of people lost their work and livelihood. And yet as the new year enters we are still left uncertain about the pandemic. The pandemic isn’t just yet over. Millions are still at risk and hundreds of thousands more can die from this. We weren’t ready for this. Mankind is very anxious about the vaccine for COVID 19. The announcement of the vaccine coming gave hope to billions of people. All are looking forward to its protection.

The problem we are encountering this new year is its distribution. The politics involved in it is also another problem. This is what faces every nation. Who gets the vaccine first? Is there enough for all the people in the world? Governments are coming up with contingency plans on how to acquire the vaccine. We are not talking of hundreds but millions of vials. Some countries are struggling to raise funds for this. The people in every nation asks, who pays for them? Of course for most nations this will not be given for free. The vaccine is very important so people will be protected. Once the vaccine is our economies around the world will recover. However, we must remember that no vaccine has ever been proven to provide man with complete immunity but still mankind is hoping to have a dose of the vaccine because it gives them hope and this is a realization for everyone that good health is their priority.

There are two vital aspects for the nation to function properly. These are the political and economic aspect of a country. Politics and economic go together. There is no politics without economics and vice versa. A person who can vindicate the greater number of public confidence wins the heart of the majority. He or she eventually becomes a leader gaining power and trust. This leader will uphold all the economic and political policies of that nation. This will greatly depend on him. He will eventually form a government wherein he would appoint people as his advisers in running the nation. Their job is to come up with various economic outline that will help the economy. This leader will have the final say on them. He will then order the members of the government put in effect these various plans. Here we can see how politics makes a great impact on the country’s economy.

Acts of God or natural disasters are events that we do not have control of. Throughout the decades we have experienced economic losses because of disasters and calamities. Because of these calamities, there is potential damage to property and loss of lives. At present we can correlate stronger calamities such as hurricanes due to climate change because of the continuous economic exposure which leads to the abuse of nature. Governments should put more emphasis on this problem. Our leaders should design a strict policy that can control or mitigate the continuous exploitation of our natural resources that can contribute to calamities and disasters with unforeseeable damage and impact on our society.

Through these policies, we can avoid economic losses. Economic losses due to natural disasters have been common in the past decades.

Aside from implementing strict policies about this problem more research is also required on the long-term impacts of calamities and natural disasters.